Skip to content
Businessloans.org.nz
Guide

What NZ business lenders actually look at.

A practical view of the credit-assessment lens used by NZ banks and alternative lenders. The numbers, ratios, and signals that drive a yes, a no, or a counter-offer at a different rate.

MS
Matt Stiles Editor, Businessloans.org.nz
Published 28 April 2026 Last reviewed 5 May 2026 Read time 16 min
Educational

Indicative only. Why we say this

Quick answer

The credit-assessment lens in five lines.

  • Cash flow first. 12 months of bank statements is the primary serviceability evidence. The lender reads them line by line.
  • Centrix on both the company and the directors. Defaults, judgements, and inquiry frequency are visible. Director-level credit matters even on a company application.
  • IRD position. Current GST and PAYE filings with no arrears is widely treated as a baseline. Arrears flags are common deal-killers.
  • Serviceability ratios. EBITDA multiples and Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) drive the maximum borrowable amount.
  • Security and PG. Asset, GSA, PPSR registrations, and personal guarantees materially shape the rate offered.
  • Industry risk weighting. Hospitality, construction, and retail commonly carry tougher pricing than professional services or healthcare practices.

The full checklist

What lenders weigh, and roughly how heavily.

Different lenders weight these factors differently, but the categories are consistent across NZ banks and alternative lenders. The weighting column is indicative of typical posture, not a published policy at any single lender.

Assessment factorWhat is examinedTypical weighting
Bank-statement cash flow12 months of trading bank statements, transaction-by-transactionHigh
Centrix business credit reportDefaults, judgements, arrears, inquiries on the entityHigh
Centrix director reportPersonal credit on each guarantor or directorHigh (especially on smaller deals)
IRD GST and PAYE positionCurrent filings, paid in full, no arrearsHigh (often a knockout test)
Serviceability (EBITDA, DSCR)EBITDA ร— multiple, Debt Service Coverage RatioHigh
Security on offerAsset, property, GSA, PPSR registration, PGHigh (drives both yes/no and rate)
Industry risk weightingLender's view of default rates by industryMedium
Owner-equity contributionDeposit, retained earnings, director loans inMedium
Repayment history on existing facilitiesHow well the borrower has serviced prior debtMedium
Aged debtors and creditorsDebtor days, creditor days, working-capital cycleMedium
Accountant relationshipQuality of management accounts, accountant's firmMedium (lower than the others, but real)
Business planPlausible plan with realistic numbersLow for established trading; medium for startups

Indicative weighting only. Weighting varies by lender, deal size, product type, and borrower profile.

Sub-topics

Six factors that move the file from declined to approved.

Across NZ business-finance applications that move from a soft-no to an approval, a small number of factors do most of the work. The cards below cover the levers that come up most frequently in practice.

1

Cleaning up bank-statement cash flow

Lenders read 12 months of bank statements line by line. Frequent dishonours, unauthorised overdrafts, gambling transactions, and signs of director drawings outpacing earnings all weigh against the file. Many borrowers find that a 60-to-90-day clean run before applying materially improves the assessment.

2

Centrix on company and director

A Centrix business credit report (https://www.centrix.co.nz/) shows defaults, judgements, and inquiry frequency. On smaller deals (under $150K), director-level credit is often weighted as heavily as company-level. Recent personal defaults flow through to the company application, even where structurally separate.

3

IRD GST and PAYE compliance

IRD arrears on GST or PAYE is widely treated as a knockout test by NZ business lenders. Current filings, paid in full, with no arrangement in place, is the baseline. Where arrears exist, an active payment arrangement with IRD plus 6 months of clean behaviour commonly improves the position.

4

Serviceability: EBITDA ร— multiple and DSCR

EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation) drives the maximum borrowable amount. A common rule of thumb on NZ SME lending is 2.5x to 4x EBITDA as the ceiling. DSCR (EBITDA / annual debt service) is widely benchmarked at 1.25x or higher; below 1.0x is generally a decline.

5

Security on offer

Specific asset security (chattel mortgage on a vehicle, property mortgage, livestock, accounts receivable), a General Security Agreement (GSA) over all business assets, PPSR registration, and personal guarantees together shape both the yes/no and the rate. Secured rates commonly land 2 to 4 percentage points below unsecured equivalents.

6

Industry risk weighting

NZ lenders weight industries differently based on observed default rates and asset-recovery patterns. Hospitality, construction subbies, and retail commonly attract higher pricing. Professional services, healthcare practices, and established agriculture commonly attract sharper pricing. The weighting is rarely published but is widely observable in offered rates.

7

Owner equity and skin in the game

A deposit (10% to 30% on asset finance, sometimes higher on commercial property) signals commitment and reduces the lender's loss-given-default. Retained earnings on the balance sheet and director loans into the company also count as equity contribution. Highly geared structures with no owner contribution face a tougher path. NZ lenders commonly look at the equity-to-debt ratio across the whole balance sheet, not just the new borrowing; a lightly capitalised company with multiple existing facilities gets less benefit of the doubt than a strongly capitalised one.

Two views of the same file

Bank-statement cash flow vs accountant-prepared accounts.

Bank-statement cash flow

Bank statements are the primary evidence of trading reality. Where a P&L can be dressed up at year-end through accruals, provisions, and timing, the bank statement is the actual money in and out. NZ lenders, particularly alternative lenders, weight bank statements above accountant-prepared accounts on smaller deals (under $250K).

A 12-month run is standard. The lender (or their automated cash-flow tool, often Illion BankStatements or Equifax NZ's equivalent) reads transaction-by-transaction. Frequent dishonours, unauthorised overdraft excursions, gambling debits, large cash withdrawals without explanation, director drawings outpacing turnover, and irregular GST payments all feed into the assessment.

A clean 60-to-90-day run before application is widely observed to improve the offered terms. The window is short enough to be achievable and long enough to be meaningful evidence.

Accountant-prepared accounts

Annual accounts (P&L, balance sheet, notes) prepared by a CA-firm accountant carry weight for larger deals (above $250K) and for relationship-managed bank lending. They normalise out timing distortions and one-off events that bank statements alone miss.

The quality of the accountant matters. Accounts prepared by a recognised CA firm (BDO, Crowe, Findex, or a substantial regional CA practice) are commonly weighted more heavily than self-prepared or basic-bookkeeping output. The lender is taking the accountant's sign-off as a quality signal.

Management accounts (current year-to-date P&L) bridge the gap between last filed annual accounts and current trading. On a deal applied for in April 2026, last filed accounts would commonly be 31 March 2025. A management P&L through 31 March 2026 fills the gap and is widely requested by NZ business lenders. The accountant is the right person to confirm whether the management accounts are fit for lender presentation.

Context

How NZ credit assessment evolved through the 2020-2026 cycle.

NZ business credit assessment tightened materially through 2022 and 2023 as the Reserve Bank lifted the OCR from 0.25% to 5.5%. Lenders responded both by raising rates and by tightening underwriting. DSCR floors lifted; many alternative lenders moved from 1.10x to 1.25x as their working benchmark. Industry weightings on hospitality and discretionary retail tightened further as failure rates rose through the cost-of-living squeeze. The combined posture squeezed marginal applications out of the market for roughly 18 months.

Through 2024 and into 2026, with the OCR easing back below 4%, underwriting has loosened modestly but not all the way back to 2021 settings. The bank-statement-first posture, in particular, has stuck. Many alternative lenders that historically did stated-income on small deals now require open-banking access to 12 months of statements. The shift is widely attributed both to improved tooling (open-banking APIs via the major banks, automated cash-flow analysis platforms) and to the reputational impact of the 2022 Fair Dealing amendments to the FMC Act 2013, which raised the bar on substantiation across financial-services market conduct.

Centrix released a substantial overhaul of its NZ credit reporting product through 2024-2025, with deeper integration of comprehensive credit reporting (positive data including on-time payments, not just defaults). The practical effect is that on-time repayment behaviour now contributes positively to a Centrix score in a way it did not pre-2024. Borrowers building a credit file from a lower base have a meaningfully shorter path back than a few years ago. The data flow into Centrix from telcos, utilities, and mainstream lenders has also widened, making the file more representative of overall financial behaviour.

IRD information-sharing arrangements with NZ lenders also tightened through this period. Bank-led requests for IRD position confirmation became more common, with some lenders integrating directly via myIR consents to verify GST and PAYE filings. The practical effect for borrowers is that an outdated or arrears IRD position is harder to hide than it was historically; the lender often sees the position directly rather than relying on the borrower's self-declaration.

The combined effect is that 2026 NZ business credit assessment is more data-rich and more transparent than at any prior point. The lender's lens is sharper, but it is also more legible to a borrower who understands what is being looked at. A borrower who walks into an application with a clean 90-day banking window, current IRD, and a known Centrix position is materially more likely to clear assessment than one who hopes the gaps go unnoticed.

By industry

Industry risk weighting and what tends to change.

Industry weighting affects both the yes/no decision and the offered rate. The bands below are observed indicative posture across NZ lenders for unsecured term loans of $50K to $150K with established trading history.

IndustryRisk postureWhat lenders look at extra
Established professional services (legal, accounting, consulting)FavourableStable client base, recurring revenue, low capex
Healthcare practices (GP, dental, vet)FavourableStable demand, professional borrower, often property-owning
Established agriculture and ruralFavourableLand equity, livestock as security, specialist rural lenders
Manufacturing (established)Neutral to favourableEquipment as security, customer concentration risk reviewed
Transport and logisticsNeutralTruck values for security, fuel cost exposure, RUC compliance
Construction main contractorsNeutralProject pipeline, retentions, subbie payment terms
Construction subcontractorsCautiousCustomer concentration on a few main contractors, cash-flow lumpiness
Retail (bricks-and-mortar)CautiousLease terms, foot-traffic data, competitor concentration
E-commerce retailCautiousPlatform dependency (Shopify, Trade Me), advertising-spend efficiency
Hospitality (cafes, restaurants, bars)Cautious to toughFirst-18-month failure rate, lease terms, liquor licence currency
Discretionary services (events, entertainment)ToughDemand cyclicality, advance bookings, deposit behaviour

Indicative posture only. Specific lenders specialise in industries where the broader market is cautious; the table reflects the overall NZ market view, not any one lender.

Worked scenarios

Three NZ files through the assessment lens.

Each scenario is illustrative, drawn from common NZ application patterns. Figures are indicative only and depend on the lender's individual credit assessment.

Established consulting firm, 8 years trading, two directors, $1.6M turnover, $320K EBITDA

Auckland professional services firm, $150K term loan

The application borrows $150K over 5 years to fit out a new office in Newmarket. Bank statements show clean trading, no dishonours, regular GST and PAYE payments. Centrix on both directors is clean with scores above 700. IRD position is current.

Serviceability is comfortable. DSCR at the requested loan sits at roughly 8x (well above the 1.25x floor), and the loan is 0.47x EBITDA (well below typical 2.5x to 4x ceilings). Industry weighting is favourable. The directors offer joint-and-several PG and a GSA.

In this scenario, the file is widely observed to attract competitive pricing across multiple NZ lenders, with rates landing in the lower half of the indicative band for unsecured term loans at this size. The offered terms typically come down to relationship and process speed rather than credit risk.

Indicative figures

Loan amount
$150,000
EBITDA
$320,000
DSCR
~8x
Centrix (both directors)
700+
Indicative rate band
10% to 13%

Cuba Street cafe, 3 years trading, sole director, $620K turnover, $95K EBITDA

Wellington hospitality operator, $80K working capital

The application borrows $80K to bridge a fit-out upgrade. Bank statements show two unauthorised overdraft excursions in the past 6 months and one IRD GST arrangement that is now current. Centrix on the director is mid-700s. The cafe industry weighting is cautious to tough.

Serviceability is tighter. DSCR at the requested loan sits at roughly 1.6x (above the 1.25x floor but not comfortable). The loan is 0.84x EBITDA (well below the multiple ceiling). The IRD arrangement and the dishonour history weigh on the file.

In this scenario, alternative lenders are widely observed to fund the deal at the higher end of the indicative band for hospitality unsecured working capital. A major-bank application would commonly stall on the dishonour history and the recent IRD arrangement. A 60-to-90-day clean run before applying typically improves the offered terms.

Indicative figures

Loan amount
$80,000
EBITDA
$95,000
DSCR
~1.6x
Centrix (director)
mid-700s
Indicative rate band
18% to 24%

Civil-works subcontractor, 6 years trading, two directors, $2.4M turnover, $380K EBITDA

Christchurch construction subbie, $250K plant finance

The application borrows $250K to add a second excavator. Bank statements show lumpy cash flow tied to main-contractor payment cycles. Centrix on both directors is clean. IRD is current. Customer concentration is high (one main contractor accounts for 58% of revenue).

Serviceability passes on EBITDA multiple (0.66x) and DSCR (~3.5x). The customer concentration is the file risk. The asset (excavator with a strong used market in NZ) provides good security under chattel mortgage with PPSR registration.

In this scenario, asset-finance lenders are widely observed to fund the deal at competitive pricing because the security is strong and the asset class is well-understood. The customer concentration prompts a deeper look but does not typically block approval where the main-contractor relationship is documented and the main contractor itself is creditworthy.

Indicative figures

Loan amount
$250,000
EBITDA
$380,000
DSCR
~3.5x
Customer concentration
58% to one client
Indicative rate band
9% to 12%

Pitfalls

Common reasons NZ business loan applications get declined.

Most declines on NZ business loan applications come down to a small number of repeated reasons. The cards below cover the patterns that arise most frequently in practice.

IRD arrears on GST or PAYE

Current GST and PAYE filings paid in full is widely treated as a baseline. An IRD arrears flag is one of the most common knockout reasons. Where an arrangement is in place, six months of clean adherence commonly opens the path back. The accountant is the right person to confirm the current IRD position before lodging an application.

Centrix surprises the borrower has not seen

Old defaults, judgements from a former business, or a forgotten Trade Me listing dispute that escalated to a default all show up on Centrix. Many borrowers are unaware of items on their file. A free MyCentrix consumer check before applying surfaces these for resolution.

Director-level credit, not company-level

On smaller deals, director credit is weighted heavily even on a company application. A recent personal default by a director, a personal IRD arrangement, or a heavy personal-loan stack all flow through. The company being clean does not insulate the application from director-level signals.

Bank-statement signals

Frequent dishonours, unauthorised overdraft excursions, gambling transactions, and director drawings outpacing earnings all weigh against the file. The lender reads transaction-by-transaction, not just the closing balances. A 60-to-90-day clean run before applying is widely observed to improve outcomes.

Serviceability that does not stack

A loan request that breaches the lender's DSCR floor (commonly 1.25x) or sits well above the EBITDA multiple ceiling (commonly 2.5x to 4x) will be declined or counter-offered at a smaller amount. The math is mechanical; relationship rarely overcomes a serviceability fail.

Industry weighting plus weak file

A hospitality operator with a thin file (under 2 years trading, mid-600s Centrix, lumpy bank statements) faces compounded headwinds. Industry weighting alone is rarely a knockout, but combined with file-level weakness it commonly is. Specialist lenders for tough industries exist, with pricing to match. A specialist hospitality financier or a construction-focused asset financier commonly funds deals a generalist would decline, at a higher rate that reflects the industry risk.

Strengthening the file

Three steps that consistently improve the assessment.

  1. 01

    Run a 60-to-90-day clean banking window

    No dishonours, no unauthorised overdraft excursions, no gambling debits, no irregular drawings. The window is short enough to be achievable and long enough to be meaningful evidence. NZ lenders read the recent statements most carefully; the most recent 60 to 90 days carry disproportionate weight.

  2. 02

    Reconcile IRD before applying

    Current GST and PAYE filings paid in full, or an active arrangement with at least 6 months of clean adherence, materially changes the file. An IRD position confirmation from the accountant ahead of lodging the application is widely observed as a smoother path than the lender surfacing a surprise.

  3. 03

    Pull a Centrix consumer report on each director

    A free MyCentrix report (https://www.mycentrix.co.nz/) on each director surfaces what the lender will see. Items resolvable before lodgement (paid defaults that are not yet showing as paid, disputes that need raising) are commonly worth resolving first. The lender's view of the file is the same view the borrower can see in advance.

Test the maths

Indicative repayments at common assessment points.

Indicative repayments at $150K over 60 months are a useful frame for thinking about serviceability. DSCR at this loan against the borrower's EBITDA is the headline number lenders look at; the calculator output gives the annual debt-service figure to plug into that ratio. Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit.

Indicative repayment

Weekly

Disclaimer

$779/week

$3,375 /month $52,481 total interest
$150,000
$5,000 $500,000
5 years
6 months 5 years
12.50% p.a.
8% (secured) 30% (unsecured)

Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.

Methodology

How this guide is built and reviewed.

The factors and weightings in this guide are drawn from published NZ lender criteria (where available), regulator guidance from the Commerce Commission and the Reserve Bank of NZ, Centrix's own published documentation, IRD published guidance on GST and PAYE compliance, and observation across many NZ business-finance applications. No single lender's policy is reproduced; the framing is the common ground across NZ banks and alternative lenders. Lender-specific deviations exist in every direction, and the offered terms at any one lender depend on that lender's own credit assessment.

Indicative rate bands are drawn from publicly available indicative pricing on NZ lender websites (ANZ, BNZ, Westpac, ASB, Kiwibank, Heartland, and several non-bank lenders) cross-referenced with broker-reported pricing. Bands are not the rate any particular borrower will be offered, which depends on the lender's individual credit assessment. The bands are observed ranges, not promises. Pricing across the NZ business-lending market shifts month-to-month with wholesale funding costs and competitive dynamics; the bands are reviewed at each guide refresh.

Industry weighting is the most subjective element of the framework. The posture column reflects the broad NZ market view based on observed pricing patterns and lender risk-appetite documents. Specific lenders specialise in industries where the broader market is cautious (a hospitality-friendly alternative lender, a construction-focused asset financier, a healthcare-practice specialist), and the table does not capture that specialist coverage. A borrower in a tough-weighted industry commonly finds materially better terms with a specialist than with a generalist.

The serviceability ratios cited (DSCR floor of 1.25x, EBITDA multiple ceiling of 2.5x to 4x) are widely observed working benchmarks across NZ SME lending. They are not statutory thresholds and they vary by lender, by product, and by borrower segment. Some lenders publish their criteria; most do not. Where a published criterion is available, the band cited reflects that. Where only practice is observed, the band reflects observed practice and is hedged accordingly.

This guide is reviewed quarterly. The current review reflects the position as at 28 April 2026. The framework here is background context, not a substitute for the lender's own assessment or for advice from an accountant or qualified business-finance adviser. The accountant is the right person to confirm the IRD and accounts position before lodging an application; a specialist business-finance adviser is the right person on lender-selection and structuring questions for a specific deal.

References

Sources

FAQ

Questions, answered

How many months of bank statements do NZ business lenders typically request?

Twelve months is the widely observed standard for NZ business loan applications across both banks and alternative lenders. Some smaller-deal alternative lenders accept 6 months for short-term working capital; some larger relationship-managed bank deals review 24 months. The 12-month window is the central case and is typically pulled via open banking or PDF statements direct from the borrower's bank.

What does DSCR mean and what is a typical NZ floor?

DSCR is Debt Service Coverage Ratio: EBITDA divided by annual debt service (principal plus interest payments). A DSCR of 1.25x means EBITDA covers debt service 1.25 times over. NZ lenders commonly benchmark a DSCR floor of 1.25x for SME term loans, with relationship-managed bank deals sometimes accepting 1.10x to 1.20x. Below 1.0x means the business does not generate enough earnings to cover the loan and is generally a decline.

How heavily does Centrix weigh on a NZ business loan application?

Centrix is widely treated as one of the highest-weighted assessment factors. The business credit report shows defaults, judgements, and inquiry frequency on the entity. Director-level Centrix is examined separately and is often weighted as heavily as company-level on smaller deals (under $150K). A free MyCentrix consumer report on each director surfaces what the lender will see.

Will an IRD arrears flag automatically decline a NZ business loan application?

An open IRD arrears flag (GST or PAYE not filed or not paid, with no arrangement in place) is widely treated as a knockout test by NZ lenders. Where an arrangement is in place and the borrower has 6 months of clean adherence, the position is materially better. The IRD position is sometimes the difference between approval and decline; the accountant is the right person to confirm the current IRD position before lodging an application.

How does a Personal Guarantee fit into the assessment?

A Personal Guarantee from each director is widely required on NZ SME business loans, particularly on unsecured products and on deals under $500K. The PG is governed by the Property Law Act 2007 and gives the lender recourse to the director personally if the company defaults. The PG affects the rate offered through the lender's view of recovery prospects; the assessment of director-level credit is part of how the PG is valued.

What EBITDA multiple do NZ lenders typically lend to?

NZ SME lending commonly works to a ceiling of 2.5x to 4x EBITDA, depending on industry and security. Asset-secured deals (equipment finance, commercial property) extend further because the security caps the loss-given-default. Pure unsecured cash-flow lending sits at the lower end of the multiple range. The exact ceiling at any one lender varies by product and by file strength.

Are accountant-prepared accounts always required for a NZ business loan?

For deals under $250K, bank statements alone are commonly sufficient at alternative lenders, though management accounts add weight. For deals above $250K and for relationship-managed bank lending, CA-firm-prepared annual accounts are typically required, often with management accounts bridging to the current period. The quality of the accountant matters; recognised CA firms add credibility to the file.

How do NZ lenders weigh industry risk?

NZ lenders use observed default rates and asset-recovery patterns to weight industries. Hospitality, discretionary retail, and construction subbies commonly attract tougher pricing. Professional services, healthcare practices, and established agriculture commonly attract sharper pricing. The weighting is rarely published but is widely observable in offered rates and in the questions asked during application.

Does owner equity (deposit) actually move the rate offered?

Yes. Increasing equity contribution from 10% to 20% on a $200K loan is widely observed to improve both the achievable amount and the rate by 0.5 to 1.5 percentage points. The deposit reduces the lender's loss-given-default and signals borrower commitment. The percentage of equity matters more than the dollar size.

What is a GSA and how does it differ from specific asset security?

A General Security Agreement (GSA) gives the lender a security interest over all the borrower's present and after-acquired property, registered on the PPSR. Specific asset security (a chattel mortgage on a named vehicle, or a property mortgage) covers one identified asset. A GSA is broader and is commonly required by NZ business lenders alongside specific asset security on the financed item.

How does repayment history on existing facilities affect a new application?

Clean repayment history on existing business facilities (term loans, asset finance, overdrafts, business credit cards) is widely observed to improve the offered terms on a new application. NZ lenders commonly request 6 to 12 months of statements on each existing facility, looking for on-time repayments and no missed instalments. A demonstrated track record of servicing debt is itself an assessment factor.

What are aged debtors and creditors and why do lenders look at them?

Aged debtors is the breakdown of who owes the business money and how overdue those invoices are; aged creditors is the equivalent for what the business owes. NZ lenders commonly review the aged-debtors and aged-creditors reports to assess working-capital health. A high proportion of debtors past 90 days signals collection problems; rising creditor days signal cash-flow strain. Both feed into the broader serviceability assessment.

Do NZ lenders still ask for a business plan?

For established trading businesses with 2 or more years of accounts, a formal business plan is rarely required. The trading history is the evidence. For startups (under 12 months trading) and for material expansions (a new branch, a new line of business), a written plan with financial projections is commonly required. The plan's plausibility against industry norms is examined more than its formatting.

How long does a NZ business loan credit assessment typically take?

Indicative timing varies by lender and product type, and is subject to the lender's assessment. Alternative-lender online unsecured loans commonly assess in hours to days; relationship-managed bank lending commonly takes 2 to 6 weeks. Asset finance secured by readily marketable assets typically falls between. The completeness of the file at lodgement materially affects the timing; a file with all documents on day one is widely observed to clear assessment faster.

Disclaimer

Indicative content only. Not personalised financial advice.

A business loan is a commitment that runs for months or years, and repayments come out of the same operating cash flow as everything else. Before committing, it is worth modelling the weekly and monthly cost against the business's working-capital position, which is what this site is built to help with. Borrowing at a level that stays comfortable through a quiet quarter, not just a strong one, is widely regarded as the safer frame.

What this site is

A calculator and information tool. Not a lender, not a broker, not a registered financial adviser. Nothing here is personalised financial advice.

What the figures show

Modelled estimates based on the inputs you enter. Not a quote. Not an offer of credit. Not a guarantee of approval, rate, or fees.

What the lender decides

Final rates, fees, and approval are set by the lender after a CCCFA-appropriate assessment of the applicant's circumstances and credit decision.

Commercial disclosure

Businessloans.org.nz earns a commission from Prospa when a visitor applies through this site and their application is approved. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and it does not influence the rate Prospa offers. Full disclosure on the partner page.

Tax, GST, and accountant framing

Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) are general in nature and subject to your accountant's confirmation on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional advice from a registered financial adviser or chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame.

This page is
coming soon.

Important information

About this site, the figures, and your protections.

Last reviewed 5 May 2026.

1. What this site is

Businessloans.org.nz is a New Zealand education site and a free repayment calculator. It is not a lender, not a broker, and not a registered financial adviser. We do not arrange credit, hold client money, or provide regulated financial advice as defined under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 Part 6 or the Financial Services Legislation Amendment Act 2019. Nothing on this site is personalised financial advice.

2. The calculator and figures

All numbers shown by the calculator, in worked examples, and across the site are indicative only and modelled from the inputs entered. The figures are not a quote, not an offer of credit, and not a guarantee of the rate, fees, term, or approval available to any specific business. Final pricing, fees, and approval are set by the lender after the lender's own credit assessment.

3. General information, not advice

Content on this site is general information (class information). It does not take into account the financial situation, objectives, or needs of any particular business or person. Before making a borrowing decision, professional advice from a licensed Financial Advice Provider, a chartered accountant, or a solicitor is widely regarded as the safer frame, particularly where amounts are material or the borrowing involves a personal guarantee.

4. Commercial relationship with Prospa

When a calculator user clicks "see if you qualify", the application hands off to Prospa, our New Zealand SME finance partner. Businessloans.org.nz earns a referral commission from Prospa when a referred application converts to a funded loan. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and does not change the rate, fees, or terms Prospa offers the business. We do not claim Prospa is the cheapest or best lender for every applicant. Full disclosure is on our partner page.

5. Tax, GST, and accountant framing

Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) on this site are general in nature and subject to confirmation by your accountant on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional tax advice from a chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame. Inland Revenue is the primary source for any specific NZ tax-treatment question.

6. Privacy and personal information

Consistent with the Privacy Act 2020, we do not run lead-capture forms on this site. Calculator inputs stay in the browser and are not transmitted to a server we control. We use Google Analytics 4 for aggregate, non-personal traffic data only. When a visitor clicks through to Prospa they leave our site, and Prospa's privacy policy applies. The Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) framework applies at the lender level where a sole trader's borrowing is wholly or predominantly for personal use, or where a personal guarantor is involved.

7. Fair dealing posture

This site operates under the fair-dealing requirements of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 Part 2 and the Fair Trading Act 1986. We avoid misleading or deceptive conduct, false representations, and unsubstantiated claims. Numeric or regulatory claims are hedged or sourced to a primary New Zealand authority (NZTA, MBIE, Inland Revenue, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Stats NZ, Commerce Commission, Financial Markets Authority).

8. Limitation of liability and governing law

To the maximum extent permitted by New Zealand law, Businessloans.org.nz, its operators, and its contributors are not liable for any loss or damage (direct, indirect, consequential, or otherwise) arising from use of the site or reliance on its content, indicative figures, or third-party information. These terms are governed by the laws of New Zealand. Any disputes are to be resolved in New Zealand courts.

Long form: terms, privacy, footer disclaimer.