Eligibility and lender criteria
How NZ lenders assess a commercial-property application.
NZ commercial-property lenders typically assess four buckets: the borrower (the trading business or investor entity), the security (the property itself), the income (lease covenant for investors, trading cash flow for owner-occupiers), and the structure (LVR, term, IO window, fixing). A registered valuation by a Property Institute of NZ-accredited valuer is a standard requirement, and the lender commissions or accepts the valuation directly. A building report and seismic assessment are also commonly required, particularly for buildings over 30 years old or those that fall under the Earthquake-Prone Building register thresholds.
Owner-occupier applications typically require 2 to 3 years of trading accounts, GST returns, an aged debtors and creditors report, and a 12-month forward cash-flow forecast incorporating the new ownership cost. The major banks commonly look for an interest-cover ratio (ICR) of 1.5x to 2.0x EBITDA against new debt service. Many SMEs find the ICR is the binding constraint rather than LVR, particularly where the trading business is service-based and the building cost is high relative to revenue. Where the borrower is buying the building it currently leases, the ICR test commonly improves because the existing rent expense converts into mortgage interest plus principal repayment, and the principal slice does not count toward the ICR calculation.
Investor applications lean heavily on the Deed of Lease. Lenders commonly look for a remaining term of at least 3 to 5 years, a tenant of acceptable covenant (national or listed tenants are preferred; SME tenants are assessed individually), a recent rent review on or near market, and standard commercial Deed of Lease terms (ADLS or comparable). Lenders typically apply a discount to investor net rent of 10% to 20% to allow for vacancy, rates, insurance, and maintenance when calculating servicing. Where the lease has less than 18 months to run, lender appetite typically drops sharply, and the deal commonly moves to non-bank specialists or shorter-term bridging structures.
Personal guarantees are typically required from the directors or controlling shareholders of the borrowing entity, even where the loan sits in a property-holding company. The PG is enforced where the property security is insufficient to clear the debt on enforcement. The accountant is the right person to confirm the entity structure and the practical implications of the PG against the specific position. Some borrowers split the property and the trading business across separate entities (a property-holding company that leases to a trading company), which is a common NZ structure for asset-protection and succession-planning purposes.
Non-bank specialists (Avanti Finance, Resimac Asset Finance, Liberty Financial, Pepper Money) typically write to the same regulatory framework as the major banks but apply different credit appetite. Higher LVR, shorter trading history, secondary location, and recently-leased property are all areas where non-bank lenders compete. Indicative rates run 8% to 11% on these deals, with some pricing inside that band on stronger profiles, subject to the lender's assessment. Many borrowers find a non-bank settlement followed by a refinance to a major bank at the 2 to 3-year mark is a common path where the trading record is too short for major-bank pricing at first settlement.
Insurance is a non-negotiable requirement on commercial property lending. Material damage, public liability, and (in some cases) business interruption are typical. Earthquake cover is standard in NZ commercial policies; lenders commonly check for full reinstatement values rather than indemnity, and verify the policy is annually renewed. Underinsured commercial property remains a common reason for declined applications or higher pricing, particularly for buildings in seismic zones around Wellington and the upper South Island.